<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget OpenDNS, use Google Public DNS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/</link>
	<description>Tiny Tips for the Common Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-932</guid>
		<description>OpenDNS is faster for me too. I&#039;m in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenDNS is faster for me too. I&#8217;m in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogman514</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>dogman514</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-909</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m sticking with OPEN DNS and what&#039;s is with this bias for google i have lost all confidence in your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sticking with OPEN DNS and what&#8217;s is with this bias for google i have lost all confidence in your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-904</guid>
		<description>I tried Google Public DNS and its fast
My report shows almost 50% less latency but when I changed name server for one of domain
it took time to reflect that changes on my local PC and as soon as I changed it to Open DNS 
I can see name server change</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Google Public DNS and its fast<br />
My report shows almost 50% less latency but when I changed name server for one of domain<br />
it took time to reflect that changes on my local PC and as soon as I changed it to Open DNS<br />
I can see name server change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailorgeek</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>sailorgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-890</guid>
		<description>@Carl

I agree I&#039;ve been curious and checking this website out and sofar has been quite interesting. But this just makes me lose confidence in you&#039;re site.

You would have to do some extensive testing to make it viable.

But, I do agree that more competition would be nice in the DNS market (if it even is a market). 
So far using the google dns has not improved any of the speed that I have used.
I also suggest using GRC (Gibson Research Company&#039;s DNS benchmarking tool)

https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carl</p>
<p>I agree I&#8217;ve been curious and checking this website out and sofar has been quite interesting. But this just makes me lose confidence in you&#8217;re site.</p>
<p>You would have to do some extensive testing to make it viable.</p>
<p>But, I do agree that more competition would be nice in the DNS market (if it even is a market).<br />
So far using the google dns has not improved any of the speed that I have used.<br />
I also suggest using GRC (Gibson Research Company&#8217;s DNS benchmarking tool)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailorgeek</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>sailorgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Well... Acually open dns is faster and more secure with a robust community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Acually open dns is faster and more secure with a robust community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilo Martin</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilo Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-874</guid>
		<description>What about Google tracking down EVERY website you visit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Google tracking down EVERY website you visit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Does Google provide filtering services? Or phising protection? The data I&#039;ve seen indicates that Google DNS and Open DNS are equally fast so why this Googlemania? Whats the benefit of changing OpenDNS to Google DNS? Why do you call Google &quot;the mother of all DNS resolvers&quot; - it&#039;s a new service.  I&#039;m sorry to say  that this uncritical, rahter biased post makes me lose confidence in your articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Google provide filtering services? Or phising protection? The data I&#8217;ve seen indicates that Google DNS and Open DNS are equally fast so why this Googlemania? Whats the benefit of changing OpenDNS to Google DNS? Why do you call Google &#8220;the mother of all DNS resolvers&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s a new service.  I&#8217;m sorry to say  that this uncritical, rahter biased post makes me lose confidence in your articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwg</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>jwg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-866</guid>
		<description>But does it do content filtering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But does it do content filtering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Levine</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-860</guid>
		<description>The advantage of OpenDNS is that you can configure many settings, such as website filtering and being able to use keywords for websites regardless of the browser being used.

Though I&#039;m sure Google will offer reliable and fast DNS resolution, I&#039;m going to sit back and see how they do. In the mean time, I&#039;m going to stick with OpenDNS until Google proves they can provide a hands down better experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advantage of OpenDNS is that you can configure many settings, such as website filtering and being able to use keywords for websites regardless of the browser being used.</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m sure Google will offer reliable and fast DNS resolution, I&#8217;m going to sit back and see how they do. In the mean time, I&#8217;m going to stick with OpenDNS until Google proves they can provide a hands down better experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dozier</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/forget-opendns-use-google-public-dns/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dozier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1623#comment-859</guid>
		<description>...I don&#039;t know about the &quot;mother&quot;  of all DNS resolvers, but it is nice to see competition in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I don&#8217;t know about the &#8220;mother&#8221;  of all DNS resolvers, but it is nice to see competition in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

