<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2010 &#8211; Does it Offer Total Security?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/zonealarm-internet-security-2010-does-it-offer-total-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/zonealarm-internet-security-2010-does-it-offer-total-security/</link>
	<description>Tiny Tips for the Common Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorporateGeek</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/zonealarm-internet-security-2010-does-it-offer-total-security/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>CorporateGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1107#comment-398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why you don&#039;t agree with the review. The conclusion is:
&quot;ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2010 is, at this moment, a somewhat sub-par effort.&quot;
Also it states that: &quot;ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2010 had one of the weakest performances in our series when it came to anti-malware protection.&quot;

Isn&#039;t this what you say as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you don&#8217;t agree with the review. The conclusion is:<br />
&#8220;ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2010 is, at this moment, a somewhat sub-par effort.&#8221;<br />
Also it states that: &#8220;ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2010 had one of the weakest performances in our series when it came to anti-malware protection.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this what you say as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Roberts</title>
		<link>http://tinyhacker.com/hacks/zonealarm-internet-security-2010-does-it-offer-total-security/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinyhacker.com/?p=1107#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Since Zone Alarm&#039;s sale to Checkpoint, they are merely trading in on their former good name. I highly  disagree with the review of Zone Alarm Internet Security 2010. This software is Zone Alarm Security Suite with a new label, since ZASS has so much negative baggage.  Changing the name of a failed product is a marketing gimmick -- like &quot;new and improved.&quot; In this case it is neither. The interface and incompatibility with Windows apps like System Restore -- let alone 3rd party software --all remain unchanged.  I put up with ZASS far too long. The high annual renewal fee is money down the drain. After five years of grief -- though their email tech support tried its best -- i uninstalled ZASS (not easy, even with Revo Uninstaller), reactivated my Windows Firewall and tried Microsoft&#039;s Security Essentials. I&#039;m far from an MS supporter but this free product picked up two trojans ZASS had missed and causes no conflicts I can see.  My PC boots faster and hasn&#039;t crashed since. Security Essentials is a very welcomed and pleasant surprise. I would have paid for it, but MS hardly needs donations. MS has done something right for once. MSE is far superior to Zone Alarm anti-virus etc products, whatever new names they may give it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Zone Alarm&#8217;s sale to Checkpoint, they are merely trading in on their former good name. I highly  disagree with the review of Zone Alarm Internet Security 2010. This software is Zone Alarm Security Suite with a new label, since ZASS has so much negative baggage.  Changing the name of a failed product is a marketing gimmick &#8212; like &#8220;new and improved.&#8221; In this case it is neither. The interface and incompatibility with Windows apps like System Restore &#8212; let alone 3rd party software &#8211;all remain unchanged.  I put up with ZASS far too long. The high annual renewal fee is money down the drain. After five years of grief &#8212; though their email tech support tried its best &#8212; i uninstalled ZASS (not easy, even with Revo Uninstaller), reactivated my Windows Firewall and tried Microsoft&#8217;s Security Essentials. I&#8217;m far from an MS supporter but this free product picked up two trojans ZASS had missed and causes no conflicts I can see.  My PC boots faster and hasn&#8217;t crashed since. Security Essentials is a very welcomed and pleasant surprise. I would have paid for it, but MS hardly needs donations. MS has done something right for once. MSE is far superior to Zone Alarm anti-virus etc products, whatever new names they may give it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

